In a bold move that could redefine the tech industry, top antitrust officials from the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) are reportedly preparing to ask a federal judge to require Alphabet Inc., the parent company of Google, to divest its popular Chrome browser.
The demand, if approved, would mark one of the most aggressive antitrust enforcement actions against a technology company in decades, potentially reshaping the online search and artificial intelligence (AI) markets.
The DOJ’s initiative comes in the wake of an August ruling by Judge Amit Mehta, which found that Google had unlawfully monopolized the search market. This new step aims to enforce structural remedies, including significant measures related to Google’s AI initiatives and its Android smartphone operating system, according to sources familiar with the case.
Alongside the DOJ, several state attorneys general who have joined the antitrust lawsuit are expected to recommend additional measures. These include data licensing requirements designed to foster competition in the digital marketplace. The proposals, set to be presented this week, could significantly alter the dynamics of the search engine industry and the rapidly growing AI sector, Bloombery.
Google’s Chrome browser plays a pivotal role in the company’s dominance of digital advertising and search. As the most widely used browser globally, Chrome gives Google unparalleled access to user data, enabling the company to fine-tune its advertising algorithms and drive its revenue. In 2023 alone, ads accounted for the majority of Alphabet’s $282.8 billion in revenue.
READ ALSO: IMF Cautions Asia: Retaliatory Tariffs Could Threaten Economic Growth
The integration of Chrome with Google’s AI initiatives, particularly its flagship product Gemini, has further consolidated the company’s power. Gemini, which is currently positioned as an advanced AI answer-bot, is being developed into a multifunctional assistant capable of navigating and interacting across the web. Critics argue that this integration unfairly extends Google’s dominance into emerging technologies, stifling competition.
If Judge Mehta accepts the DOJ’s proposals, the ruling could set a precedent for addressing monopolistic practices in the tech industry. In addition to the divestiture of Chrome, the DOJ and allied states are expected to recommend the implementation of data licensing requirements. These measures are intended to break down barriers for competitors, ensuring greater innovation and consumer choice in the market.
The potential breakup of Chrome from Google would be the most aggressive antitrust action since the DOJ’s unsuccessful attempt to split up Microsoft Corp. over two decades ago. However, this time, the stakes are even higher, given the central role of AI and digital platforms in the modern economy.
Google has strongly opposed the DOJ’s plans, calling the proposals excessive and harmful to consumers. Lee-Anne Mulholland, Google’s Vice President of Regulatory Affairs, criticized the DOJ for pursuing what she described as a “radical agenda.” She warned that such actions could undermine American technological leadership at a critical moment for global innovation.
READ ALSO: Iran Denounces EU and UK Sanctions on Shipping Lines as Unjustified
“The government putting its thumb on the scale in these ways would harm consumers, developers, and American technological leadership,” Mulholland said, emphasizing the potential risks of regulatory overreach.
Despite Google’s objections, the company’s shares dipped by 1.8% to $172.16 following reports of the DOJ’s plans. While Google’s stock had seen a 25% increase earlier in the year, this news has raised concerns among investors about the long-term implications of antitrust enforcement, Yahoo.com.
The DOJ’s case against Google, initiated during the Trump administration and carried forward under President Joe Biden, reflects a bipartisan commitment to curbing the power of Big Tech. The move underscores growing concerns about the concentration of market power in a handful of technology giants and the need for regulatory intervention to promote competition.
If successful, the forced divestiture of Chrome and other proposed measures could reshape the competitive landscape of the tech industry, providing opportunities for smaller players to innovate and grow. However, the case also raises critical questions about the balance between regulation and fostering technological advancement in an increasingly digital world.
The Justice Department’s push to rein in Google represents a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate over antitrust enforcement in the digital age. As the case unfolds, it will not only determine the future of Google’s operations but also set a benchmark for how governments address monopolistic behavior in an era dominated by technology and data.
READ ALSO:
Biden Administration Urges Congress to Approve Emergency Disaster Relief Funding
For consumers, businesses, and policymakers, the outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications—reshaping how we interact with technology and how the digital economy evolves in the years to come.
Antitrust enforcers are urging a federal judge to require Google to divest its Chrome browser, citing its dominance as a key entry point for its search engine, which controls 61% of the U.S. market. This move, part of broader efforts to address Google’s monopolistic practices in search and search ads, could reshape the tech landscape.
Recommendations also include unbundling Google’s Android operating system from its search and Play Store, licensing search data, and giving advertisers more control. Website publishers have raised concerns about Google’s AI features, claiming they suppress traffic and revenue. A final ruling on these measures is expected by August 2025.