As the world closely watches a heated U.S. presidential election, oil markets are also feeling the impact. Crude prices edged higher amid a combination of election-driven uncertainty and a looming tropical storm in the Gulf of Mexico that threatens production.
West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude rose by 0.7%, settling close to $72 a barrel after climbing by as much as 1.7% earlier in the day. Brent crude followed suit, advancing by 0.6% to settle above $75 per barrel. While oil initially made strong gains, concerns about market volatility kept prices from reaching new highs.
The Gulf of Mexico’s production could see significant disruptions as Tropical Storm Rafael continues to strengthen. The storm’s projected path poses a direct threat to U.S. offshore oil and natural gas platforms, potentially impacting about 1.7 million barrels of daily output. Chevron Corp. has already responded by shutting in production in the Gulf, and Shell Plc has evacuated some non-essential personnel as a precautionary measure.
The Gulf of Mexico accounts for a significant portion of U.S. oil production, and potential disruptions could tighten supplies, affecting both domestic and international markets. The threat of the storm comes at a time when oil markets are already grappling with global uncertainties, including fluctuating demand and the unpredictable outcome of the U.S. presidential election.
The U.S. presidential election is adding further uncertainty to oil markets as polls show a close race between incumbent Donald Trump and challenger Kamala Harris. The election outcome is expected to have far-reaching implications for U.S. energy, trade, and foreign policies, with both candidates presenting starkly different approaches.
A second Trump administration would likely be favorable toward the U.S. shale industry, potentially easing restrictions on domestic oil production and maintaining a more skeptical stance on renewable energy.
In contrast, a Harris administration is expected to bolster climate initiatives, with more stringent regulations on fossil fuel production and support for renewable energy sources. Such policy shifts could directly affect the oil sector, both in terms of production and in the pricing dynamics driven by changes in demand and supply.
In addition to domestic policies, foreign relations could shift dramatically based on the election outcome. RBC Capital Markets LLC has suggested that another Trump administration may impose tighter sanctions on Iran, which could reduce the global supply of Iranian oil. Additionally, Trump’s administration may relax restrictions on Russian oil flows, potentially reshaping the geopolitical landscape of global oil supply.
READ ALSO: U.S. Election: FBI Links Bomb Threats at Polling Locations to Russian Email Domains
Amrita Sen, director of research at Energy Aspects Ltd, remarked on the current administration’s approach, noting, “The current US administration hasn’t enforced any sanctions. In fact, it’s encouraged people to buy Iranian oil because that’s what keeps prices down. Just enforcing Iranian sanctions would be enough to take 1 million barrels off the market.”
Beyond domestic political uncertainty, oil markets are also grappling with decreased demand from China, which has weighed heavily on global oil prices. Since the end of June, the U.S. benchmark has dropped by more than 10% due to weaker-than-expected demand from China and increased oil supplies from the Americas. This downward trend in demand led the OPEC+ alliance to postpone plans to restore production, as the market conditions have not supported a stable price recovery.
In response to declining demand, Saudi Arabia recently lowered oil prices for Asian buyers for December, signaling that the Kingdom is more concerned about slow demand growth in China than the geopolitical tensions in the Middle East.
With Chinese economic activity showing signs of moderation, global oil demand has not rebounded as anticipated. This has forced oil producers to take cautious steps in maintaining supply, as the market continues to experience a tug-of-war between supply constraints and demand challenges.
As the U.S. election outcome remains uncertain, oil markets are bracing for a period of increased volatility. A second Trump administration could prioritize domestic oil production, possibly reducing reliance on foreign imports and implementing policies favorable to the shale industry. This might stabilize domestic supply but could lead to potential diplomatic conflicts over foreign oil policies, especially regarding sanctions on Iran and Russia.
Conversely, if Kamala Harris secures the presidency, the oil industry may face tighter regulations and a shift toward renewables, which could drive demand for alternative energy sources. Such a shift might decrease long-term demand for oil but could also lead to a more diversified and resilient energy market.
The direction of U.S. foreign policy also looms large over global oil supply, with sanctions and trade deals potentially reshaping alliances and trade flows. In particular, tougher sanctions on Iran could remove a substantial volume of oil from the market, which would likely lead to higher prices if other major producers do not step in to fill the gap.
The interplay between an unpredictable election, a threatening storm in the Gulf, and sluggish demand from major markets like China has left oil prices in a precarious position. For the foreseeable future, oil markets will remain reactive to both political developments and environmental threats.
As a significant driver of economic and geopolitical stability, the U.S. energy sector stands at a critical juncture, with global markets closely watching how the election and storm-related disruptions will unfold.
In the near term, oil producers and investors alike will be paying close attention to any election outcomes, regulatory changes, and foreign policy adjustments that could alter the global energy landscape.